Change Risk Assessment & Approval Automation
Change management is critical to IT stability yet painfully manual. Change Advisory Board (CAB) members spend hours reviewing change requests, assessing risk, identifying conflicts, and determining approval requirements. Poor risk assessment leads to failed changes (industry average: 30-40% failure rate), unplanned outages, and rollbacks. Meanwhile, low-risk changes languish in approval queues, slowing velocity. Traditional ServiceNow workflows lack the intelligence to distinguish routine patches from high-risk infrastructure changes.
Workflow goal
Automate change risk assessment, conflict detection, and approval routing to reduce CAB review time by 60% while improving change success rates and accelerating low-risk changes.
Change Manager
CAB Members
Release Management
Infrastructure Teams
End-to-End Agentic Flow
1
Change Request Intake
Ingest change request from ServiceNow
Extract scope, timing, affected CIs, implementation plan
2
Risk Assessment
Analyze change type, scope, and complexity
Evaluate historical success rate for similar changes
Assess affected systems' criticality and redundancy
Check timing against blackout windows and peak usage
3
Impact Analysis
Query CMDB for dependent services and applications
Identify upstream/downstream dependencies
Estimate blast radius if change fails
Flag potential user/business impact
4
Conflict Detection
Check for overlapping changes to same systems
Identify resource contention or maintenance windows
Detect changes that could compound risk
5
Approval Routing
Determine approval level based on risk score (standard/normal/major/emergency)
Route to appropriate approvers (auto-approve, peer review, CAB, executive)
Generate risk summary and recommendations for approvers
6
Pre-Implementation Validation
Verify implementation plan completeness
Check rollback procedures are documented
Confirm required testing and validation steps
7
Post-Implementation Tracking
Monitor for incidents related to change
Capture success/failure outcome
Update risk models based on actual results
CMDB relationship analysis
Historical pattern recognition
Multi-factor risk scoring
Intelligent approval routing
Human approval always required for high-risk changes
CAB review mandatory for major changes
Emergency change escalation to senior leadership
Read-only access to production systems during assessment
Change success rate
Mean time to approval (by risk category)
Auto-approved change percentage
CAB meeting preparation time
Failed change root cause attribution
Risk prediction accuracy
